Sunday, 10 November 2013

Limit of Quantification: Does it matter?

Validation of Analytical Methods for Pharmaceutical Analysis

Defined as "the  lowest amount of analyte  in a  sample which  can be quantitatively determined with  suitable precision and  accuracy" in ICH Q2(R1), limit of quantification (or 'quantitation limit' in the ICH terminology) is an important method performance characteristic which is typically demonstrated during analytical method validation.

Although the concept of limit of quantification (LOQ) is relatively straightforward, it is often a source of confusion during method validation. This appears to be due to a number of factors:

(i) Determining the LOQ
Because the method validation guidance in ICH Q2(R1) presents a number of methods for estimating the LOQ, it is tempting to conclude that it should be investigated during method validation studies. However, the determination of the LOQ is integral to the development of an analytical method which seeks to quantify low levels of compounds in sample matrices, e.g. the determination of impurities and/or degradation products. Therefore it should be established that the required level can be achieved when developing the method and then merely confirmed as part of method validation.

(ii) Suitable precision and accuracy
The LOQ is expressed in terms of 'suitable precision and accuracy', therefore it is essentially a user defined level since the analyst must decide what level of precision and accuracy is suitable.For example, a requirement for precision of 5 %RSD would result in a higher LOQ that a requirement of 10 %RSD.

(iii) Reporting thresholds
 For many methods the lowest concentration level that is required for a method is defined by the reporting threshold. For example, an impurities method may have a reporting threshold of 0.05% w/w with respect to the amount of drug present, as directed in ICH Q3A. Therefore, in method development it would be ensured that the method is designed to work at 0.05%, and in validation it would be demonstrated that suitable precision and accuracy are obtained at 0.05%. In effect, the actual LOQ for the method is not relevant since no value below the reporting threshold will be reported.

So, to go back to the original question, "Limit of Quantification: Does it matter?", the answer depends on the requirements for a particular method. If the true LOQ for the method is required then it does matter and should be thoroughly determined during method development and confirmed during method validation. However, if the lower limit of the range of the method is predetermined, such as a reporting threshold, then whether the method is actually capable of quantitative measurement below this value is not relevant, thus it may not matter (provided of course that the method is capable of quantitative measurement at the reporting threshold).

Want to know more about analytical method validation? Visit the course list page on the MTS website for dates and locations of our open enrolment training course, Validation of Analytical Methods for Pharmaceutical Analysis. The course may also be delivered at your site as in-house training. Contact us for more information and a quotation.


No comments:

Post a Comment